Hugo Chavez, alive and well in the 70s
Venezuelan president Hugo Chavez continues to operate in his 1970s socialist drama. Denied continued arms from the United States, Venezeula recently signed a deal to buy 30 Su-30s from Russia, along with a number of military helicopters, for about a billion dollars. He also visited Hanoi, where he said he "wants to work more closely with Vietnam as part of his alliance against American imperialism." The government of Vietnam is none-too-comfortable with this old position, however, and canceled trips to areas that serve as reminders of the decades of war in Vietnam.
Of course, the current administration is playing its part in this 1970s socialist-versus-capitalist rehash, calling Chavez "one of the biggest dangers facing Latin America" and describing his interactions with Cuba as "particularly dangerous."
I'd rather we didn't bother with Chavez one way or the other, as he represents one pole of a dispute between domineering socialism and domineering commercial-military dictatorship. As described in this Amnesty International report, both sides have attempted to gain influence and power at the expense of the Venezuelan people. By continuing to play our part as the cackling, imperialist bad guy, we give Chavez an external threat to point to and rally people against, while he goes right on quashing dissent. It's good that we've stopped arms sales to Venezuela, but we should have done that a long time ago, before Chavez ever saw power. We don't need the money and the region doesn't need weapons.
We need to get over our irrational fear of a socialist threat that is now irrelevant and put aid into the region, with an emphasis on keeping political struggles above-board and keeping the population safe. Let's not be part of the drama anymore. We gain nothing from it.