« Jill Carroll actually free | Main | Targeting the rate-limiting step »

Framing the question

Anyone trying to develop a counterinsurgency plan for present-day Iraq should be able to develop a reasonable plan for this scenario:

It's just after Christmas, 1776. You have just been placed in command of the British effort in the Americas. Though large-scale military efforts have largely succeeded in diminishing the insurgents' ability to directly contest your government in the field, insurgent attacks continue. Notably, an allied contingent was captured the day after Christmas in Trenton. Earlier administrative and warfighting policies have led to an environment of discontent, with wide-spread support for insurgent forces. Many outside powers also view this as an opportunity to contest your nation's dominance on the world scale. How do you propose to effectively halt the insurgency, retain civil government in the area and avoid the appearance of vulnerability to other world powers?

Comments (1)

tim:

Yeah but imagine the colonists can bleed you 250,000 sterling for ever 1 us dollar they spend. It's not winnable...to paraphrase Boyd, what is winning and what is losing?

We're fucked.

About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on April 03, 2006 01:19 PM.

The previous post in this blog was Jill Carroll actually free.

The next post in this blog is Targeting the rate-limiting step.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.